Structuralism vs Functionalism
Текст на Статията
- Пързалка: 1
- The late 1800s, psychology is emerging as a science and two distict schools of thought begin to take shape
- Пързалка: 2
- influenced by Darwin's theory of evolution
- William representing Functionalism .He is pragmatic ,energetic and interested in the practical applications of psychology
- Пързалка: 3
- stimulus error
- Edward Titchner presenting Structuralism He is a formal, meticulous and focused on the details of conscious experience
- Пързалка: 4
- Edward Tichner represents structuralism.He focused on the details of conscious experience citing that the goal of psychology was to discover the basic elements of consciousnessHe used introspection ,rigorously training observers to analyze their conscious experiences
- Пързалка: 5
- William James represent functionalism and was interested in the application of psychology.He further cited that we must understand behaviour in terms of its functionfunctionalism focuses on real-world applications, understanding how the mind helps us adapt
- Пързалка: 6
- Strength of Structionalism: It provides a systematic, detailed analysisweakness; Its critized for being artificial and subjectivestrength of functionalism: focuses on real-world applications, understanding how the mind helps us adaptweakness: It lacks the rigorous control of experimental methods
- Пързалка: 7
- References:SchultzEllen,s( 2011(.A history of Modern Psychology( J.D HAGUE,ED,:l,Schraber,Trans:10th ed)(2024). youtu.be.https://youtu.be/qBe9qjx-Ahg
Присвояване на Изображения
- 5699456 - Alex Green - (Разрешително Free To Use / No Attribution Required / See https://www.pexels.com/license/ for what is not allowed )
Над 30 милиона създадени разкадровки
Без Изтегляния, без Кредитна Карта и без Регистрация, за да Опитате!
