If I study political science, then I will go to law school
Dia: 5
I will go to law school, Therefore I must study political science
Dia: 6
p: I study political scienceq: I will go to law school
Dia: 7
Fallacy of the Converse:p → q q--------∴ p
Dia: 9
“Wait so me saying If I study political science, then I will go to law school is invalid?”
Dia: 10
“No Keira, that part is just the statement, the conclusion is invalid”
Dia: 11
“Ok, so what if I say I study political science, therefore I will go to law school”
“Then that would be a valid argument”
Dia: 12
Direct Reasoning:p → q p--------∴ q
Dia: 13
“Ok so what If I say I study political science or I don’t want to go to law school” and that I “Don’t study political science”
Dia: 0
"Actually, That is not a valid argument. For instance, a counterexample is that you could go to law school, but instead of having to study political science you can study economics”
"So I Therefore don’t wanna go to law school”
Bye Bye!!
“Well, that argument is valid but it is actually unsound. This is due to the fact that since you DO wanna go to law school, the premise that you “'don’t'” is untrue"
Meer dan 40 miljoen storyboards gemaakt
Geen Downloads, Geen Creditcard en Geen Login Nodig om te Proberen!