Поиск
  • Поиск
  • Мои Раскадровки

Reicher and haslam revision resource

Создать Раскадровку
Скопируйте эту раскадровку
Reicher and haslam revision resource
Storyboard That

Создайте свою собственную раскадровку

Попробуйте бесплатно!

Создайте свою собственную раскадровку

Попробуйте бесплатно!

Текст Раскадровки

  • Background - Based on Zimbardo's stanford prison experiment to see why normal people carry out acts of tyranny when given power
  • The study of Zimbardo was unethical so Reicher and Haslam conducted their own and created a reality TV show out of it for the BBC
  • To see whether people can conform to social roles, Reicher and Haslam wanted to examine conditions that lead to changes in behaviour of a group.
  • Time series IV - Permeability of role: Guard were told they were selected on certain criteria e.g. reliability/trustworthy. The participants were told the tests weren't reliable so on the 3rd day of experiment could be promoted to being a guard. guards had to observe behaviour to see who was worthy of the promotion - Legitimacy of roles: on day 6 prisoners were told there were no real differences between prisoners and guards - cognitive alternative: On day 4 a new prisoner was chosen because of his background as a Trade Union official
  • Aim & time series IV
  • Aim - To provide detailed data on developing interactions between two groups of unequal power and privilege
  • Ethics & Dv - participants were tested on...
  • Harm was reduced in a number of ways: - BPS committee sanctioned the study - There was a 3 phase testing - 2 independent clinical psychologists monitored the prison at all times - Paramedics were on standby - One site security guard - Round the clock independent ethics committee
  • Daily swabs of saliva were taken to ascertain cortisol levels and participants could video and audi record themselves
  • Social variable - social identification, awareness of cognitive alternatives, right-wing authoritarianism Organisational variable - compliance with rules, organisational citizenship Clinical variable - self-efficacy, depression
  • Sample
  • 27 people were chosen and the final 15 chosen to ensure a diversity of age/social class/ethnicity.
  • 332 people recruited
  • This was divided into 5 groups of 3 people matched on personality variables
  • Medical and character references were obtained and police checks conducted
  • Completed a battery of psychometric tests that measured both social variables and clinical variables
  • Underwent a full weekend assessment by independent clinical psychologists
  • from each group of 3, 1 was randomly selected as a guard the other 2 prisoners
  • Prison environment - Elstree studios with 3-person cells > showers which was separate from the guard's quarters that had a dormitory, bathroom and mess room. The guards had an observation post to monitor the prisoners Entrance and delivery areas were separate from main prison areas by sliding, lockable steel mesh grilles.
  • Prisoners were given uniform for: . Lack of self-identity . Reduce individual uniqueness . To enhance group identity . Encourage group cohesion . Make them feel inferior
  • Uniform
  • Guards were given uniform to: . Enhance group identity . Encourage group cohesion . To make them feel superior . Reduce individuality so guards got into their role
  • Prisoners: . T-shirt with 3 digit number . Loose trousers . Flimsy sandals . Shaved head on arrival
  • 8 days
  • 5 guards
  • Procedure pt 1
  • guards were invited to a hotel evening before study began, were shown prison timetable and told responsibilities to ensure prison ran as smoothly as possible
  • On morning of the study guards were taken in a blacked-out van to the prison and briefed on prison layout and resources available to them
  • R&H worked with the BBC and examined the behaviour of 15 participants over 8 days
  • Qualitative data was gathered through observations made via audio/video recordings which allowed researchers to gather info about guards/prisoner's thoughts and feelings
  • Asked to draw up a set of rules and punishments however had to abide by ethical rules that o physical violence could be used.
  • Guards then changed into their swell-made 'guard' uniform
  • Procedure pt 2
  • Assigned 3 to a cell
  • Announcement was made that introduced permeability intervention: prisoners were told that guards had been selected because of certain personality characteristics and if similar traits were shown then they may get promoted to be a guard
  • By day 8 an authoritarian system of inequality was about to start but went against ethical constraints so study was stopped
  • Guards: . Well-made uniform . Formal trousers . Shirt and tie . Superior food and extra snacks . Superior living conditions
  • 9 prisoners
  • 9 prisoners arrived one at a time and on arrival had heads shaved off
  • They were given no other information apart from prison rules, list of prisoner rights and uniform
  • One prisoner was promoted on day 3 then after that no more were allowed
  • On day 6 prisoners were told that there was no actual difference between guards and prisoners so the groups were therefore not legitimate
  • On day 4, prisoner 10 was introduced to provide cognitive alternatives as he was a trade union official so may have the skills to negotiate and organise collectivist action

Image Attributions

Создано более 30 миллионов раскадровок