Vyhľadávanie

Structuralism vs Functionalism

Skopírujte tento Storyboard
Structuralism vs Functionalism

Text z Príbehu

  • Šmykľavka: 1
  • The late 1800s, psychology is emerging as a science and two distict schools of thought begin to take shape
  • Šmykľavka: 2
  • influenced by Darwin's theory of evolution
  • William representing Functionalism .He is pragmatic ,energetic and interested in the practical applications of psychology
  • Šmykľavka: 3
  • stimulus error
  • Edward Titchner presenting Structuralism He is a formal, meticulous and focused on the details of conscious experience
  • Šmykľavka: 4
  • Edward Tichner represents structuralism.He focused on the details of conscious experience citing that the goal of psychology was to discover the basic elements of consciousnessHe used introspection ,rigorously training observers to analyze their conscious experiences
  • Šmykľavka: 5
  • William James represent functionalism and was interested in the application of psychology.He further cited that we must understand behaviour in terms of its functionfunctionalism focuses on real-world applications, understanding how the mind helps us adapt
  • Šmykľavka: 6
  • Strength of Structionalism: It provides a systematic, detailed analysisweakness; Its critized for being artificial and subjectivestrength of functionalism: focuses on real-world applications, understanding how the mind helps us adaptweakness: It lacks the rigorous control of experimental methods
  • Šmykľavka: 7
  • References:SchultzEllen,s( 2011(.A history of Modern Psychology( J.D HAGUE,ED,:l,Schraber,Trans:10th ed)(2024). youtu.be.https://youtu.be/qBe9qjx-Ahg

Priradenie Obrázkov

  • 5699456 - Alex Green - (Licencie Free To Use / No Attribution Required / See https://www.pexels.com/license/ for what is not allowed )
Bolo vytvorených viac ako 30 miliónov storyboardov
Na Vyskúšanie nie je Potrebné Žiadne Sťahovanie, Žiadna Kreditná Karta a Žiadne Prihlásenie!
Storyboard That Family