If I study political science, then I will go to law school
Šmykľavka: 5
I will go to law school, Therefore I must study political science
Šmykľavka: 6
p: I study political scienceq: I will go to law school
Šmykľavka: 7
Fallacy of the Converse:p → q q--------∴ p
Šmykľavka: 9
“Wait so me saying If I study political science, then I will go to law school is invalid?”
Šmykľavka: 10
“No Keira, that part is just the statement, the conclusion is invalid”
Šmykľavka: 11
“Ok, so what if I say I study political science, therefore I will go to law school”
“Then that would be a valid argument”
Šmykľavka: 12
Direct Reasoning:p → q p--------∴ q
Šmykľavka: 13
“Ok so what If I say I study political science or I don’t want to go to law school” and that I “Don’t study political science”
Šmykľavka: 0
"Actually, That is not a valid argument. For instance, a counterexample is that you could go to law school, but instead of having to study political science you can study economics”
"So I Therefore don’t wanna go to law school”
Bye Bye!!
“Well, that argument is valid but it is actually unsound. This is due to the fact that since you DO wanna go to law school, the premise that you “'don’t'” is untrue"
Vytvorených viac ako 40 miliónov storyboardov
Na Vyskúšanie nie je Potrebné Žiadne Sťahovanie, Žiadna Kreditná Karta a Žiadne Prihlásenie!