Plessy V Furgeson
Text z Príbehu
- TheSeparate Car Act was enacted in Louisiana in 1890, which made it required that trains provided separate cars for white and non white passengers, and they were not allowed to sit in a car together.
- You're coming with me boy
- Homer Plessy
- Judge Ferguson
- Attorney Albion Torquee
- The Separate Car Act is a violation of the 13th and 14th amendment
- Plessy took the case to the Louisiana Supreme Court, but there he was also deemed guilty, so he took the case to the United States Supreme Court.
- No it's not, the law is constitutional. Plessy is guilty
- The Supreme Court
- The Supreme Court ruled 7-1 in Judge Ferguson's favor. They claimed the Separate Car Act was not a violation of the 14th amendment, because while it required separate cars, the cars were still equal. and the 14th amendment only calls for legal equality and not social equality.
- Though one Justice did agree with Plessy. Justice John Marshall Harlan argued that segregation laws imply that races are not equal, and therefore are a violation of the 14th amendment
- Despite this, Plessy was found guilty.
Bolo vytvorených viac ako 30 miliónov storyboardov