Riley v. California

Riley v. California

More Options: Make a Folding Card

Storyboard Description

This storyboard does not have a description.

Storyboard Text

  • Mr. David Riley sir, you're driving a car with expired tags with an expired license. I'm gonna have to search your car.
  • Noooo! My phone! I had it on my person! This feels like a fourth amendment right violation :(
  • Brip Biller $$ XD
  • Wow! I'm so lucky I found this evidence right in his pocket!
  • Because the cell phone didn't threaten an officer's security, they had no right to search the phone without a warrant. Additionally, the evidence wouldn't expire in evidence lock up. This was unlwaful.
  • According to People v. Diaz, this was a legal search of the cellphone since the incident occurred during a legal search.
  • Since iPhones can't hurt an officer, I move that a cell phone search requires a search warrant. This evidence is thrown out. Searching a cell phone needs more protections considering how much personal information is on it. 
  • Wow! I agree! Thank you for setting this new precedent and breaking from tradition. In this crazy digital world I'm glad you judges understand what's at stake! 
Explore Our Articles and Examples

Try Our Other Websites!

Photos for Class   •   Quick Rubric   •   abcBABYart   •   Storyboard That's TpT Store