These models offer the hope of building spacetime from abstract algebra using higher category theory.
What a crackpot, indeed! We string theorists are pursuing a more algebraic approach to understanding the different p-branes in string theory. Some new understanding comes from the application of what we also call higher category theory.
I hope that there is no need to elaborate that in string theory and related theories such as supergravity theories, a brane is a physical object that generalizes the notion of a point particle to higher dimensions.
Of course! I know that branes are dynamical objects which can propagate through spacetime according to the rules of quantum mechanics. I know that you know that they have mass but did you know that they can have other attributes such as charge?
You quantum gravitists assume you know everything. Well, you don't. And, yes. I am cognizant, even before you grew a brain, that branes can have charge attributes.
We'll keep on working with other quantum alternatives to string theory. Also, I've finally reached to a conclusion that it would not make sense to work with string theorists.
I totally agree. In fact, our approaches are completely different.
There is nothing in common with our approaches for our methodology will always be superior. I do not need to work with crackpots.
Before you leave, which are going to do in a while, I noticed you keep referring to me as a crackpot. Do you even know what that actually means?
Oh my! I have fallen to my knees. What a crackpot, no doubt!