I'm anti-federalist because federalism promotes too strong of a central government and we just fought a war to gain independence from a strong centralized government.
Not to mention, this new constitution favors the wealthy and would drown out the voices of those living in rural areas.
Also, the constitution you are proposing does not suffciently protect individual rights so without a bill of rights I cannot agree to the aforementioned constitution.
I'm federalist because I believe there is no need for a bill of rights because if only specific rights are listed, what becomes of the rights are that aren't listed and the fact that state constitutions already protect rights.
Secondly, the constitution we propose has a system of three branches that represent a different aspect of the people and the checks and balance system in place protects against abuse.
Finally, a strong president, one that leads the executive branch mentioned in our new constitution is needed because the executive branch needs a strong leader, but the limitations imposed will stop them from turning into a tyrant like you fear.