Yes, for 3 reasons: He is very Intelligent. He has prior experience. He is conservative.
Great send him to be reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee!
I have decided to nominate a colleague of mine, Hugh Janus, as a Supreme Court Justice.
Before he is reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee, do you think he is a good candidate for such an important role?
Sent to Committee
*mumbles under breath* Who is this guy?
This is the Judge Prez Trump has appointed
Hello I am Hugh Janus!
Reviewed by Committee
The president tells us you are intelligent, you have judiciary experience, and you are conservative. Please elaborate.
Why yes I have much to say! I received my masters in clown acting from Ringling Bros Clown College. I have served my jury duty 3 times, but once I voted a man innocent who was actually guilty, but that a story for another day. Also I may be a bit conservative, but I will try to leave my views out of it, except cases that involve abortion or immigration or minorities.
Thank you for your time. Our recommendation to the Senate. From there you will find out if you have been voted in.
Recommendation sent to Senate for vote
The vote ended 100-0 to reject the appointment... Hugh Janus went for his Doctorate at Clown College to impress the Committee with hopes to one day become a justice.
ABSOLUTELY NOT!! He is dumb, has no experience, and is too conservative.
This is their recommendation. They were not very fond of Hugh Janus. I think we should take their word. Also the Senate will not vote someone in if they are not intelligent, have experience, and are almost neutral in politics.