Verbal agreements are binding. The victim can sue for violation of the agreement.
Robbery was not a crime. The victim could sue the robber for up to three times the value of the stolen property.
You are in trouble. Why did you get into a fight at school. Go upstairs so I can beat you.
Parents have ultimate power over their children. No one else has power over their children.
I disagree that this law is not right because saying that you are going to buy something from someone and then end up not doing it then that person is allowed to sew you.
Verbal agreements are not binding for adults rather agreements must be written and signed to be upheld in court.
I disagree that robbery is not a crime because those people have worked hard to get where ever there are and for some one to go out there and just steal it is just not right and they should be punished for what they have done.
Robbery is considered a crime and is punishable by a fine and/or jail time.
I disagree that parents have ultimate power of their kids because if they have ultimate power over their kid then they are basically saying that they are not allowed out of their sight and have to assign them stuff to do because the parents have ultimate power.
Parents have power over their children with restrictions. Abuse and neglect is strictly prohibited.
I agree because it is fair and both people have rights and are able to express what they want to say.
I agree because robbing someone is not right and they should be punished for what they have done. It is not fair to the people that got robbed because the robber could have taken something important from the person and now it can't be replaced because it has been stolen.
I agree that this law is fair because parents shouldn't have ultimate power over their kids they should just have power over their kids so they can feel like they have more room and not always being bossed around.