Hey john do you know to ensure national stability and prosperity and to control the negative effects of political factions!!.
Yup this mean, this stance emerged in response to the weaknesses of the government under the Articles of Confederation, which lacked a robust central authority
Slayt: 2
Wow that is a great question, they feared it would lead to tyranny and violate individual liberties, they argued that the new Constitution consolidated too much power at the national level.
Hey Alex, I have a question what is the Anti-federalist position on strong central government?
Mmmm this mean is just won independence from a powerful and distant British government, many Anti-Federalists worried that the proposed U.S. Constitution
Slayt: 3
Federalists, like you Alex initially believed a Bill of Rights was unnecessary and potentially dangerous because the Constitution already established a limited government with specific powers
Hey John, I still have some questions what i need you help!Federalist position regarding Bill of Rights?Anti-federalist position regarding Bill of Rights
The Anti-Federalist position was that a Bill of Rights was absolutely necessary to protect individual liberties from the potential abuses of a powerful new federal government.
Thank you john for everting, i really understand this now.
40 Milyondan Fazla Hikaye Panosu Oluşturuldu
İndirme Yok, Kredi Kartı Yok ve Denemek İçin Giriş Gerekmiyor!