salon sb 2

Slayt: 1
true, but with an absolute monarch there will be an abuse of power and the risk of tyranny. no one wants that. my question is as follows; are these conditions actually better than the state of nature?...
with a government easily overthrown, it's likely that there will be decentralization. also, once a monarch has been overthrown, there might not be a ruler for several years.
Slayt: 2
in response to your question, yes it is, because the state of nature is the WORST condition to possibly live in. therefore, an absolute monarch should have all power, even if it means that they wrongfully kill.
according to your logic, since the state of nature is the worst condition, it also means that a limited government is just as fitting...if not more!
if wrongful killings or punishment happen, civillians have the right to overthrow. the fact that they might not have a set ruler for a certain amount of time after that is still better that the state of nature, right?
Slayt: 3
with this being said, my government is better.
Slayt: 0
what is all this noise-- OH MY... just WHAT are you two doing on the table?!?
but-- I didn't even finish my argument!!

30 Milyondan Fazla Storyboard Oluşturuldu

İndirme Yok, Kredi Kartı Yok ve Denemek İçin Giriş Gerekmiyor!