Ok let's stay on topic here. While is it true that the colonists desired for more individual power rather than a more autocratic government. The AoC makes it harder to enforce certain issues
Don't you see! Join. us Simon! We ARE the truth. States are holy...remember what happened with the Brits. Do you want to lose all that tea again?
Like what?
zzz
Under the Articles of Confederation, there would likely be fewer constitutional protections and safeguards for freedom of speech in the context of social media. Individuals and entities may have fewer legal mechanisms to challenge censorship or unfair practices by social media platforms.
Differences in state-level regulations could lead to conflicts and legal disputes between states, especially when social media companies operate across state lines. This could result in complex legal battles and a lack of uniformity in social media policies.
Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government had limited authority and lacked the power to regulate or oversee many aspects of daily life, including communication technologies like social media. This would likely mean that there would be little to no federal involvement in social media regulation or censorship.
ARGHHHHHHH NOOOOOOOO MY WEAKNESS!!! FACTS AND LOGIC AHHH...
*yawn* OMG WHAT HAPPENED WHY IS THERE A TRUCK??
Oh okay cool. So you wanna get pizza or something?
Well i beat Fen Branklin in the argument so a truck smashed into him and he got sent to hell again
Sure
SMASH
END
Over 40 millioner storyboards skabt
Ingen Downloads, Intet Kreditkort og Intet Login Nødvendigt for at Prøve!