הירשם כמורה
10.5
טקסט Storyboard
- שקופית: 1
- In adult court, Kent was convicted and sentenced to 30–90 years in prison.His lawyers appealed, arguing that the juvenile judge violated Kent’s due process rights.
- His due process rights are being violated!
- Was it fair to transfer him without proper procedures?
- שקופית: 2
- The Supreme Court ruled that juveniles must be given:A formal waiver hearing is held before being moved to adult courtAccess to their records was used in the judge’s decisionA written explanation of why the judge is waiving the case
- You can’t treat juvenile court like a shortcut. Fair process matters.
- שקופית: 3
- Kent v. United States strengthened due process protections for juveniles nationwide. Juvenile courts must give kids a fair hearing, access to their records, and a written explanation before sending them to adult court. The ruling made juvenile court procedures more transparent, fair, and accountable.
- Kent’s case set the foundation for fairness in how young people are moved to adult court. A fair hearing isn’t optional — even for juveniles.
מעל 40 מיליון לוחות סטוריבורד נוצרו
אין הורדות, אין כרטיס אשראי ואין צורך בכניסה כדי לנסות!
