Registreeru õpetajaks
SCOTUS cases
Süžeeskeem Tekst
- Libisema: 1
- I think that too but more importantly this case decides whether the supreme court has jurisdiction over legislative apportionment which is a big deal for the entire country!
- Yo did you heard about that Baker v Carr case I think they totally diluted the votes with their horrible apportionment.
- How so?
- If it's decided the supreme court has jurisdiction then the supreme court could step in and force any state to change it's legislative apportionment which would be a massive change in power since usually states are free to apportion as they please as long as they follow all the federal rules.
- Libisema: 2
- I think that too but more importantly this case decides whether or not a state racially gerrymandering is a constitutional issue which is a big deal for the entire country!
- Yo did you hear about that Shaw v Reno case I think they totally reapportioned based on race to get additional black representatives.
- How so?
- If it's decided that it is a constitutional issue then gerrymandering can never be based in race even if benefiting minorities unless justified by a compelling governmental interest which would give everyone equal protection under the 14th amendment
- Libisema: 3
- THANK YOU FOR READING!
Loodud on üle 40 miljoni süžeeskeemi
Proovimiseks Pole Vaja Allalaadimist, Krediitkaarti ega Sisselogimist!
