Untitled Storyboard
Kuvakäsikirjoitus Teksti
- Your argument is void because this is a case of intrastate commerce, therefore a case of states rights. The federal legislation that gave you your permit is unconstitutional because it extends beyond Congress' commerce powers.
- I vote in favor of Gibbons
- So there we go, a unanimous vote in favor of Gibbons
- I vote in favor of Gibbons as well
- I vote in favor of Gibbons too
- It is the opinion of the court that we affirm with Mr.Gibbons. Firstly, the regulation of navigation by steamboat operators and others for purposes of conducting interstate commerce is a right reserved to congress under the Commerce clause. Therefor, the NY monopoly is invalid as it interferes with the clause in the constitution. Secondly, I would like to further define the language in the commerce clause to include not just articles of interstate trade, but also the intercourse among the states, which in this case includes navigation. The purpose of the commerce clause and this ruling is to maintain free trade.
- United States Supreme Court: Ogden's Argument
- United States Supreme Court Decision:
- New York State Court: Ogden Files and Injunction against Gibbons and wins
- Chief Justice Marshall's Majority Opinion
- United States Supreme Court: Gibbon's Argument
Yli 30 miljoonaa kuvakäsikirjoitusta luotu
Ei Latauksia, ei Luottokorttia ja ei Vaadi Kirjautumista Kokeilemiseen!
