Engel v. Vitale
Montāžas Teksta
- Engel v. Vitale (1962)
- Does a public school requirement that students participate in a nondenominational prayer violate the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, as applied to states by the Fourteenth Amendment?
- ISSUE
- Plaintiff’s argument
- A prayer was spoken aloud and in the presence of a teacher, who either led the prayer or selected a student to do so. Steven Engel against board president William Vitale, argued that the prayer violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
- We Shall Now Pray...
- We want to pray!
- Defendant’s argument
- The defendant, school board president William Vitale, argued that, as recitation was voluntary, it was not in violation of the First Amendment.
- Amen!
- requiring public school students to participate in a religious prayer is unconstitutional!
- Majority Opinion
- "We are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Bring. "
- Establishment clause was only meant to prohibit the establishment of a state-sponsored church.
- Dissenting Opinion
- "those who wanted to could still "find a place in which (they) could pray when they) pleased to the God of (their) faith in the language (they) chose."
Izveidoti vairāk nekā 30 miljoni stāstu shēmu