Structuralism vs Functionalism
Montāžas Teksta
- Slidkalniņš: 1
- The late 1800s, psychology is emerging as a science and two distict schools of thought begin to take shape
- Slidkalniņš: 2
- influenced by Darwin's theory of evolution
- William representing Functionalism .He is pragmatic ,energetic and interested in the practical applications of psychology
- Slidkalniņš: 3
- stimulus error
- Edward Titchner presenting Structuralism He is a formal, meticulous and focused on the details of conscious experience
- Slidkalniņš: 4
- Edward Tichner represents structuralism.He focused on the details of conscious experience citing that the goal of psychology was to discover the basic elements of consciousnessHe used introspection ,rigorously training observers to analyze their conscious experiences
- Slidkalniņš: 5
- William James represent functionalism and was interested in the application of psychology.He further cited that we must understand behaviour in terms of its functionfunctionalism focuses on real-world applications, understanding how the mind helps us adapt
- Slidkalniņš: 6
- Strength of Structionalism: It provides a systematic, detailed analysisweakness; Its critized for being artificial and subjectivestrength of functionalism: focuses on real-world applications, understanding how the mind helps us adaptweakness: It lacks the rigorous control of experimental methods
- Slidkalniņš: 7
- References:SchultzEllen,s( 2011(.A history of Modern Psychology( J.D HAGUE,ED,:l,Schraber,Trans:10th ed)(2024). youtu.be.https://youtu.be/qBe9qjx-Ahg
Attēlu Piedēvējumi
- 5699456 - Alex Green - (Licence Free To Use / No Attribution Required / See https://www.pexels.com/license/ for what is not allowed )
Izveidoti vairāk nekā 30 miljoni stāstu shēmu
Lai Izmēģinātu, nav Nepieciešama Lejupielāde, nav Kredītkartes un nav Nepieciešama Pieteikšanās!
