philosipher in court

Slidkalniņš: 1
This court will now hear the argument; should a single person have indefinite control within a government and its country? These two highly praised philosophers, Thomas Hobbes and Charles de Montesquieu, will present their respective views. Mr. Hobbes, you may begin.
Slidkalniņš: 3
This court will now hear the argument; should a single person have indefinite control within a government and its country? These two highly praised philosophers, Thomas Hobbes and Charles de Montesquieu, will present their respective views. Mr. Hobbes, you may begin.
Slidkalniņš: 0
In the natural state, mankind is driven by self-interest. The chaos that prevails from is inevitable. Without a powerful, centralized authority, society falls into disorder. A single ruler is necessary to impose order and maintain peace. The sovereign must have absolute power, for only then can they ensure the overall security and the well-being of the people.
Overall, without a singular reprentative, the very fabric of society will unravel. Only through fear and control can we achieve the necessary conditions for peace. The ruler, unchallenged, becomes the protector of all, a beacon of stability in a tumultuous world.

Izveidoti vairāk nekā 30 miljoni stāstu shēmu

Lai Izmēģinātu, nav Nepieciešama Lejupielāde, nav Kredītkartes un nav Nepieciešama Pieteikšanās!