Statistics Adventure

Zdrs: 1
In that case, you'd still use the z-test! Knowing the variance, even with a small sample size, makes a difference
But what if my pail has less than 30 shells and I know the variance?
But what if my bucket has less than 30 shells and I know the variance?
Zdrs: 2
If your pail contains more than or equal to 30 and the variance is known or unknown, use the z-test.
How about the Central Limit Theorem? It applies when the sample is ≥ 30 right?
Wait, so if my pail has 30 or more shells, whether I know the variance or not, I still use the Z-test? That’s so much clearer
Zdrs: 3
Tumpak! But, if your pail contains less than 30 shells and you don't know the variance, then use t-test, okay?
Thanks, Bella! You made stats feel less like a headache. I think I won't drop out anymore HAHAHA!
Zdrs: 0
Got it! Less than 30 shells and no clue about the variance? Time for the t-test!
In that case, you'd still use the z-test. Knowing the variance, even with a small sample, make a difference.
Yep! As long as you have ≥30 sample, and the variance? Doesn't matter, just go with the z-test.
Anytime, Sheene! Just remember when in doubt, think of your sea shells. Now, let's grab some ice cream before it gets too dark.

Ustvarjenih več kot 40 milijonov zgodboknjig

Brez Prenosov, Brez Kreditne Kartice in Brez Prijave!