If there are only 5 coins who gets redeemed first if neither the father or son have been redeemed
Rabbi Yehuda
Rabanan
If a father would want to redeem his bechor but he only have 5 coins he should redeem himself first
NO NO NO! The son comes first
Rabbi Yehuda
Rabanan
!!!מצות דגופה אדיפעה
and its not as strong as a legal document and you cant take that money
The lean on a property is like it is written in the torah and its stronger then a legal documentand a cohen can go and take the 5 coins
Rabbi Yehuda
CASE Rabanan vs Rabbi Yehuda
A:Actually It is probably abuse.Because the mitzvah for the son on the father is the greater mitzvah
Q: hmmm how can you take the money from the buyer wouldnt that just be abuse to him?
LAW: Rabanan vs Rabbi Yehuda
In this case the buyer is a big looser, no fair! I would think that shouldn't the buyer just say that he should use his own money? But if the seller would say that he can't redeem himself with the indebted money why can you say that, you can't redeem yourself. with the money from the indebted property?
REASON: Rabanan vs Rabbi Yehuda
Ona'ah is monetary abuse. it means that in this case if someone selling a house wants to get his money back for his sons Pidyon, but it would be ONA'AH (abuse) to take it back AGGRESIVELY.
ONA'AH I think can also mean monetary abuse but I don't think in this case it's an example of monetary abuse. Since the mitzvah on the dad is greater than on the son it is not abuse.
the question of אונאה and רש”י’s answer
רש”י
Tosafots two questions on Rashi
Tosafot
רש”י
THE DIFFERENCE between Rashi’s understanding of אונאה here and תוספות’s understanding.