Jonathan Garnica - Storyboard
Storyboard Text
- Slide: 1
- Introduction
- - Talk about how functional neuroimaging can not be used to explain an individual's behavior due to how the results are interpreted and used in court- Introduce Dugan case, talk about how they compared him to other psychopaths, and difficulty of functional neuroimaging and looking at complex traits- Can also briefly mention how many non-psychopaths have abnormal amygdala but don't to things like Dugan did- Introduce Yepez case, what his claim was, and how conviction was upheld, try to compare his MAOA activity to others, saying there was a statistical link between MAOA gene activity and violent behavior- Then go into how this brings up a limitation of functional neuroimaging and its use in court, has potential but struggles with Group 2 individual
- Slide: 2
- Central Claim
- - Why can't we use trends seen with functional abnormalities in adults when they can be applied to juveniles?- Talk about Nuzzo article and how it looked at men with low activity in ACC- Compare with adolescent developpmental process, brings up the question of why it's okay to apply it to one group but not another
- Slide: 3
- First Idea
- - Go back into functional neuroimaging, primarily fMRIs and PET scans and how they work- Explanation of function, what they highlight, and validity in court of law- Reference Daubert v. Merrel Dow, how these two types of neuroimaging technologies pass and can be admitted in court of law
Over 30 Million Storyboards Created
No Downloads, No Credit Card, and No Login Needed to Try!
